“Does circus and The Simpsons in one line sound good to you? How about 29 pages of great comedy and story driven narrative that ends in no time and you’re left wondering where those pages went to because it was so good? If it’s yes and yes to those questions, heck, even if you're not a Simpsons’ fan, you'll enjoy this.”

“The story is done well and everything follows a logical order, very entertaining and hilarious at times. Each chapter and sequence of the story is linked and connected well to establish the foundations of the twists and surprises ahead. What I like most about this issue is that you find yourself wanting to keep reading this even after it’s finished.”

“That's plenty of stories with high lasting appeal, there's not a bad apple between them, just the level of quality and depth that separates each story. You will read this issue several times and will come back to it often in years to come thanks to Radioactive Man and his charming good looks (Ah, I mean, charming stories).”

“The whole concept works so well together with the new and old interchanging with each other and you never lose track of what's going on. The best part is, if you missed past Simpsons Comics, this issue basically contains the best stories previously been published. It won’t act as a supplement to those other 99 issues, but if you were stuck on a deserted island for some strange reason and you had to pick one comic book to read, this would be it.”

Editor’s Choice are comics which are awarded highly and deserve to be in your collection, or at the very least, need to be read. Click on the comic image to read their review.

“This issue highlights the lack of quality put into other issues found in earlier Simpsons Comics titles and other series. I wonder why all comics are not treated with this much care and love? The fact remains that this is a series with only two parts and the quality shows because of the quantity. Not many issues to produce, more effort put into this to make it better. It’s not always the case, but a possible explanation nevertheless.”